![]() 11/19/2016 at 13:45 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
2001 vs 2002 es300
Personally believe 01 looks better.
![]() 11/19/2016 at 13:50 |
|
I think it should just be fact the 01 looks better.
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:09 |
|
The 2002 looks like someone grabbed it by the eyes and pulled back
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:18 |
|
The literal botched car face lift.
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:19 |
|
The second one is literally a camry with lexus badges on it.
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:26 |
|
They both car. The ES has always been a Camry
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:27 |
|
01 for sure. 10/10 would drive, but only to church on Sunday’s
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:30 |
|
01. Any questions?
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:38 |
|
I was legitimately shocked when I found out the ES (until this newest generation) was based on the Camry rather than the Avalon. I tried real hard to avoid telling customers that when I sold them.
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:40 |
|
I just looked through all six generations of ES, and I think 4th to 5th gen is the only time they ever actually made the car better looking.
![]() 11/19/2016 at 14:51 |
|
And different sheetmetal, and a different interior, and...
![]() 11/19/2016 at 15:42 |
|
The ‘01 by far. Not only is it the better looking of the two, it still looks fantastic today IMO.
![]() 11/19/2016 at 17:12 |
|
I don’t think there’s anyone who would deny it. I mean, there are people who still insist that the earth is a disc and not a sphere, and they would unquestionably agree that the ‘02 is horrid in comparison to the’ 01.
![]() 11/19/2016 at 18:15 |
|
:( I can’t unsee this